data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ef04/5ef047b732b3182ad4c007e54bec992a1209eed0" alt=""
My two favorite concepts from this book are “double think” and “double plus good quack speech.” I see lots of evidence of both of those in our current social arrangements.
I’m glad I hung in there all the way to the end of the book, even though at several points I wanted to bail out simply because the environment and characters being portrayed felt too dismal to spend time with. Even though it was an uncomfortable read at times (especially the torture scenes), there were several concepts in the book that were more than a little intriguing to consider.
The first time I read it many years ago I found the whole premise of the story to be absurd. I thought it was ludicrous to create a world where governmental officials would dish out preposterous lies totally counter to documented evidence and expect people to simply believe them.
Um…hmmm…… yeah, right. I’d say at this point that doesn’t feel so ludicrous.
I read a quote recently that said: “Intelligence is knowing you can only believe half of what you hear. Wisdom is knowing which half to believe.” (Anonymous)
That anonymous guy sure comes up with a lot of very cool phraseology.
2 comments:
I've not read it, but since I have moments when I think I'm living it, I should do so.
Only a pleasure-sedated populace would let its government get away with the nonsense ours is up to right now. We must be living in the End Times. But it's still worth impeaching him -- just for the joy of it.
Post a Comment